This Cinephile

Saturday, May 02, 2009

The Soloist and Wolverine

The Soloist - The main problem with The Soloist is a very bad screenplay. The intentions all around are good but the pay off is never really there. It's hard to relate to a script or a film when you have no idea what the basics are. Is it a movie about the main characters evolution into a good man? Is it a movie about the other protagonists slip into mental illness? Is it just a simple social commentary about homelessness in Los Angeles? I have no idea. I also have no idea who to relate to. It seems like it's the story of journalist Steve Lopez (Robert Downey Jr.) but then there are these randomly misplaced flashbacks involving Nathaniel Ayers (Jamie Foxx). They aren't necessary, serve little purpose and are badly placed throughout the movie. So, basically, the script is awful. The direction, surprisngly, isn't much better. Once in a while, director Joe Wright stumbles upon a brilliant image although they never really seem to fit. More often than not the direction is boring sliding into cheesy territory (the awful Fantasia scene and the even worse flying pigeon scene). At this point, I expect so much more from Joe "I directed the single greatest cinematic moment of 2007" Wright. He disappointed me. The good news? The acting is superb. However, you shouldn't expect less from Robert Downey Jr. who is just excellent and Catherine Keener who is one of my faves and who does so much with so little. Foxx is a little rockier. There was something about the performance that I just didn't buy - it was the poor man's Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man. Still, he gets an A for effort. Downey Jr. easily outshines him. Again, the intentions of this movie were good, the performances made it worth it, but it all is just average for me.
Grade: C



X-Men Origins: Wolverine - I will say this for the prequel to the X-Men trilogy: the action sequences are pretty amazing. From the motorcycle scene that ends with Wolverine practically flying through the air to attack a helicopter, to the more intimate fight scenes between characters to the epic fight scene at the end, the action is spectacular. Everything else... a little boring. Maybe it's just preference but I've never really been an X-Men fan, or a Wolverine fan, or a Hugh Jackman fan. Going into the film, I was hoping for more of an ensemble. I wanted less Jackman and more Liev Schrieber (who is so, so good as Sabretooth), Ryan Reynolds (who is funny and charming as mercenary Wade Wilson who becomes Deadpool), Dominic Monaghan (who is barely in the movie), Danny Huston (who is good at being manipulative) and, especially, Taylor Kitsch as Gambit (who is a total bad ass and is so damn good looking it almost physically hurts me). They've been promoting all of these characters and they've mostly been reduced to glorified cameos. I could have done without all the "RAWRRRRRR I'm Wolverine" moments, as well. Also, and again I know very little about the actual comic book stories, but it seems to me that Wolverine is one of the characters that don't really need a back story. Isn't half of the appeal in his character that he's so damn mysterious? It was all just too focused on one thing when I think it could have been a much better story had they included different, more interesting characters in a bigger way. After all, what's the point of hiring fine young actors if you aren't going to use them?
Grade: C-

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 15, 2009

The Last House on the Left + more

The Last House on the Left - Here's something that bodes well for the upcoming remake of Nightmare on Elm Street: it seems Hollywood is only capable of remaking Wes Craven movies. A few years ago, the remake of The Hills Have Eyes was released and I still stand by the fact that it's the only remake ever to surpass the original. I won't go quite so far as to say that with The Last House on the Left remake... but it's still a hell of a good movie.
First of all, the direction by Dennis Iliadis is superb. You can tell he's trying to give the studio what they want while still trying to stay true to a certain artsy sensibility. Some of the shots in the movie are downright beautiful and don't necessarily belong in a genre film. There is a particular shot of it beginning to rain while a young girl floats in a lake that is just breathtaking.
The violence in the movie is immediate and it is unflinching and relentless. But horror movies were always made to push boundaries and cross lines. This is a horror movie (and I don't even really like calling it a horror movie because it's so not) that illustrates the difference between gore and violence for the sake of being shocking and gore and violence for the sake of emotion. Without a grisly, raw, disturbing torture and rape sequence, the subsequent actions of a mother and father would make no sense. You need to see what happens to a young girl in order to feel the need for revenge.
The movie mostly stays true to the plot of the original film (a remake itself): Mari (Sara Paxton) is on vacation with her doctor father (Tony Goldwyn) and teacher mother (Monica Potter). The family is mourning the loss of a son and they decide to get away to their lake house for vacation. Mari escapes into town to hang out with her friend Paige (Martha MacIssac) who works at the local general store. The two run into Justin, a teen (Spencer Treat Clark) who promises that if Paige sells him cigarettes, he'll get them weed. Soon they are off to a cabin to smoke weed together. Justin's family isn't supposed to be home... but guess what? They show up and they are not friendly people. They are led by a murderer (Garret Dillahunt) who recently escaped on his way to prison with the help of his brother Francis (Aaron Paul) and his girlfriend Sadie (Riki Lindhome). Then the unthinkable happens. After a car accident, Mari is raped and left for dead, shot and floating in a lake, likely to drown (little do the killers know, she's a very good swimmer!). Crew and his gang walk to the nearest house to escape an incoming store. Ironic twist! It happens to be the house of Mari's parents. When Mari stumbles to the house on her last leg, her parents exact revenge on the men (and woman) who tried to kill their daughter.
The performances are all great with Best in Show awards going to Potter as the kick ass vengeful mom and Dillahunt as the madman con. Paxton is so moving and heartbreaking during her torture scenes and while Goldwyn might be the weakest link, he's still effective as the stoic doctor trying to be strong for his family. The director adds a touch of emotion that's not necesarily found in the orignal. Combine that with great photography and great performances and you've got yourself a pretty good thriller. Sure, it drags at times. It could have been edited a bit quicker. There's a particular death scene that seems to last for 30 minutes. Some of the scenes might be a little too much. But mostly, it's a good film.
The Last House on the Left is more than a violent, bloody gore movie. It's a parents worst nightmare and it has a surprising amount of emotion and when the film is at its best, it's oddly beautiful.
Grade: B-
EDIT: The more I think about this movie, the more I really love it. It sticks with you, that's for sure. Despite the fact that it becomes a typical thriller in the last 20 minutes or so (and even when it's typical, it's still fricking awesome), it's still the best slasher genre film in the last few years. It's artistic and intelligent and well done. So I'm changing my grade even though I don't like to do that. Also, watching Aaron Paul, who plays Francis so well, get his ass kicked on Breaking Bad on Sunday night was kind of cathartic.
New Grade: B+

Mini reviews...
Battle in Seattle - Directed by actor Stuart Townsend and featuring top notch performances from Charlize Theron, Michelle Rodriguez, Martin Henderson, Jennifer Carpenter, Woody Harrelson and Ray Liotta, Battle in Seattle is based on the true story of peaceful activism that went horribly wrong in Seattle in 1999. For anyone who ever wished the world was a better place - this movie is for you.
Grade: A

Synecdoche, New York - Another ensemble cast featuring Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener, Michelle Williams, Samantha Morton, Emily Watson, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Hope Davis and Dianne Wiest, Synecdoche is the directorial debut of fiercly brilliant and unique screenwriter Charlie Kaufman. And guess what? It's fiercly brilliant and unique! A lot of people might find it pretentious and that's fine. It is pretentious. But it's also one of the most deeply affecting movies I've seen in a very long time. Had I seen it before 2008 ended, it would have ended up nicely at number 2 on my top 10 list. It's almost impossible to give a plot summary. Go to imdb. Go to the memorable quotes. There is a particular monologue given by "Minister" that more or less sums up the entire point of the movie. It's almost impossible to sum up in words how I feel about this movie other than to say this - it's brilliant.
Grade: A+

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, January 12, 2009

Top Ten List - Best Supporting Actress

10. Evan Rachel Wood in The Wrestler - She has just three keys scenes but Wood milks it for all it's worth. Cheers for going toe to toe with the great Mickey Rourke and holding her own.

09. Alison Pill in Milk - Maybe it's just my undying devotion and love for this movie, but I'd give the whole damn cast an award. Pill is barely in it, but she's still a little spitfire, whipping the men of the movie into shape and helping Harvey Milk make history.

08. Catherine Keener in Hamlet 2 - I just keep picturing her drinking that huge drink at the Mexican restaurant / bar. Keener could probably read the phone book and I would think she was worthy of high praise.

07. Viola Davis in Doubt - She's on screen for about twelve minutes but she takes full advantage of those twleve minutes to give a powerhouse performance. Her thought process is devastating in its assuredness.

06. Debra Winger in Rachel Getting Married - In a year of comebacks, Winger's is very welcome. She's been absent for way too long. She doesn't have a lot to do in Rachel Getting Married but there's that one big scene with Anne Hathaway that is shocking and riveting at the same time.

05. Amy Adams in Doubt - Viola Davis may be getting all the attention but I prefer Adams' more subtle and nuanced performance. In a movie filled with people who are stubborn and shady, Adams is the innocent and pure Sister James. Also, she's probably the key to figuring out the key mystery in the film.

04. Taraji P. Henson in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button - Sweet and tough, Henson is finally breaking through to the fore front. She should have been nominated for Hustle and Flow and this year she continues her streak of good natured supporting characters. She elevates every scene in which she is a part.

03. Marisa Tomei in The Wrestler - Looking sexier than ever, Tomei plays a single mom stripper who is, like Rourke's title character, struggling with losing her youth and looks. Unlike Rourke's character, she is capable of finally growing up. Her final scene is heartbreaking.

02. RoseMarie Dewitt in Rachel Getting Married - Anne Hathaway may be getting all the attention for her intense performance (and she does deserve it) but I actually prefer Dewitt's more subtle performance. She plays the "perfect" sister but she never becomes a cliche. She never tries to hide Rachel's flaws. And because of that she plays this role flawlessly.

01. Penelope Cruz in Vicky Cristina Barcelona - Volatile. Vivacious. Lunatic. Neurotic. Enigmatic. Sexy. Agitated spitfire. Just a few words to describe Cruz's brilliant take on the slightly crazy ex-wife of Javier Bardem's character. She has so many great scenes. Why she wins my award as the Best Supporting Actress of 2008? A specific scene when she is just released from a hospital for trying to kill herself. Bardem takes her home to meet his new American tourist girlfriend played by Scarlett Johansson. Scarlett asks her if she wants anything to which Cruz so perfectly and so simply replies, "Vodka." Great line reading. Great performance.

Tomorrow - Best Supporting Actor

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 20, 2007

30 Days of Night, Into the Wild, Across the Universe

30 Days of Night - File this under - 'What took them so long to come up with this brilliant idea?' The setting is Barrow, Alaska - the northernmost town in the United States. It's isolated for miles and miles on all sides. It snows all the time. Once a year, the small town is plunged into darkness for an entire month. This year, a mysterious Stranger (the electrifying, as always, Ben Foster) has arrived. He's destroyed all their cell phones. He cut off all their power. He killed all the sled dogs. He's burned many of the cars. Those that chose to stay (the last airplane leaves at sundown and a plane won't be back until dawn) are effectively cut off from the outside world. Being plunged into darkness for a month sounds creepy enough but when you throw a gang of supernatural vampires into the mix it's downright scary. A small band of survivors unite to try to last through the darkness and make it to daylight. They are led by Sherriff Eben (Josh Hartnett) and his estranged wife Stella (Melissa George). When I told my mom this movie was a love story, I wasn't joking. It kind of is. Stella and Eben have a lot of issues and, really, when is it a better time to realize how much you love someone than when you are being stalked by bloodthirsty vampires? (See, there's something for everyone here). The movie is directed by David Slade who last directed the fantastic film Hard Candy and he does an equally impressive job here. There's a lot of quick cuts. There's a lot of fast action. And, there's a lot of blood! His overhead shots of vampires ransacking the small town are glorious. The movie isn't exactly scary but I've seen a million horror movies and so I'm a bit jaded by now. It actually plays a little more like a Western to me (maybe I like Westerns now?). It's definitely got the swagger and attitude down. The acting is solid but nothing spectacular (it is a horror movie, after all). Hartnett particularly impressed me because I'm so used to him feeling so rigid and stiff in his roles. He actually shows quite a bit of emotion here, especially in the last act of the movie. George is the weakest link here. At times, her performance is strong but there's something about her that just annoys me (Sorry but it's true). Of course, Ben Foster steals all the scenes he is in. This is pretty much the perfect role for him. He's a great character actor who seems to love characters who are a little bit strange, to say the least. Maybe his mantra is: 'The crazier the better.' And he's great at it. Here's hoping he keeps making movies like this and keeps playing such complicated, crazy, wonderful characters. The movie starts with a hectic, gritty intensity and it doesn't let up. The movie is definitely sinister, violent and unrelentingly violent. I'm over zombies, let's return to the vampire genre! And this is a great way to start that trend!
Grade: B

Into the Wild - There are movies that you instantly forget you ever saw. There are many of those. There are movies that are enjoyable or even thought-provoking that stick with you for a few days or a few weeks, sometimes months and years. There are many of those as well. Then, there is the rarest of films - the kind that burrows into your soul. The kind that you just know will live with you forever. The kind that is absolutely unforgetable. Into the Wild is the latter. Honestly, I'm not sure how to even review this movie. In a way, it's beyond words. There's too much beauty, too much tragedy, too much unexplainable perfect-ness to try to capture in a paragraph or two of clumsy words. But I'll try. Into the Wild follows recent college graduate Chris McCandless (Emile Hirsch in a performance so powerful and astonishing, it's really hard to see how he can't be Oscar nominated in January) who burns his social security card, cuts up his credit cards and gives away his life savings to Oxfam. He leaves behind his family (Dad William Hurt, Mom Marcia Gay Harden, sister Jena Malone), gets in his car and just hits the road. We follow him on a series of life changing / life altering experiences and adventures. He meets a lot of great characters played by a lot of great actors (Holy Kristen Stewart! I was right, I was right. She can act!). He takes the name Alexander Supertramp and sets off to see it all. He does rapids from the desert into Mexico (without the permit that would require him to wait 12 years!). He works in a wheat field with Vince Vaughn. He forms a kind of tramp family with the lovely Catherine Keener. He has a moment of true clarity with an apple. All of these adventures, with hippies and nude colonies, Reno and the dirty streets of Los Angeles, moutains and deserts and sweet young love left unconsummated, his true goal is to go North - to Alaska. When he gets there he lives in a Magic Bus for over three months. He hunts (killing a moose which he writes is the biggest tragedy of his life), he pretends he's a bus driver having conversations with his imaginary passengers, he reads, he just lives. And then, well, nature has its funny ways. It's, perhaps, the biggest tragedy of all that the earth that he so worshipped and adored ultimately destroys him. To look at Emile Hirsch in those final few scenes is utterly painful. He looks so pained, to gaunt (you know, the Academy loves when actors lose a lot of weight for roles!!!). The cinematography is stunning. Sean Penn's rebellious direction is superb. The acting is downright brilliant. Hirsch, like I said, deserves to be nominated for an Oscar. I've been a fan of his for years but this is the performance that will cross him over into the mainstream - if he wants to. He gives his all to this role and the result is beyond words. The supporting cast is great as well especially turns from Hal Holbrook, Catherine Keener and Kristen Stewart. The bottom line is that this movie is just plain amazing. As far as I'm concerned, it's the best movie of the year and I can't forsee anything beating it. I'm sure some people out there might find the main character to be a pompous, stubborn asshole, but I see him (as does Penn) as some sort of martyr. His story is inspirational. If I had the guts, I would love to do the same thing. Is there anything wrong with this movie? I could say I didn't love Jena Malone's wise-beyond-her-years narration but that would just be nitpicking. As far as I'm concerned, this movie is as close as you can get to perfect.
Grade: A+

Across the Universe - Sometimes being visually daring doesn't exactly pay off. Sure, this movie looks great. It's got style by the truckload but that doesn't help a boring cliche filled script and loads of mediocre performances. The movie, of course, is set to Beatles music. And the songs are mostly great. The actors are up to the challenge of singing them. But sometimes it's overload. I'm pretty sure the only reason the character of Prudence is even in the movie is so they have an excuse to sing 'Dear Prudence' at one point. She's absolutely the most unnecessary character in recent memory. A few other characters show up just so they can randomly sing songs as well. In a way, the movie is an acheivement in art, design, style and dance. However, it's still a movie and as a movie it suffers from not having a strong script. It suffers from using every 60s era cliche it can possibly find. It suffers from being a little too strange for it's own good. It suffers from being about 40 minutes too long. (It's called editing Julie Taymor, please embrace it next time). There's no character development. No character arcs. No lessons learned. Nothing. But let's ignore the fact that the characters never learn or develop and remain completely one-dimensional because the movie looks great! No, I'm not that easy and you shouldn't be satisfied that easily either. Maybe what irked me the most was that it didn't follow the one very simple rule of musicals. You can pretty much get away with murder in a musical as long as you follow this one simple rule: All songs must advance the plot. This movie fails miserably at that. Jim Sturgess does a fine job playing the main character Jude, a man who leaves Liverpool to find his father in America and instead finds and falls in love with Lucy (Evan Rachel Wood). Wood... annoys me sometimes. In some movies I love her and in some movies I don't. I loved her in Pretty Persuasion and Down in the Valley. I didn't like her here. Dana Fuchs pretty much steals the show as Sadie, a very Janis Joplin type singer. Her rendition of Helter Skelter is easily the best part of the film. The movie isn't so bad, however. There are some great scenes. I particularly loved the bowling alley scene, the 'Happiness is a Warm Gun' scene and the 'Let it Be' scene (eventhough, again, random characters who only serve a function to sing and then disappear). It's not the best movie of the year (nowhere near it) but its not the worst either. It's more or less a two hour long glorified music video.
Grade: C-

Labels: , , , ,